- Prohibited-practices screen (Art. 5)
- Risk management system (Art. 9)
- Annex IV technical documentation (Art. 11)
- Human oversight (Art. 14)
- Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment for deployers (Art. 27)
- Post-market monitoring + 72-hour incident report (Art. 72-73)
One platform. 9 frameworks. Hundreds of cross-mappings.
We translate the world's most consequential AI + privacy regulations into a single, tenant-aware compliance OS. Enable only what applies. Switch frameworks in one click. Reuse evidence across regimes through curated cross-mappings.
Pick the regimes that apply to your AI estate.
Each framework drives its own dashboards, document types, calendar cycle, and Counsel preamble. Mixed footprints get cross-mappings so evidence flows once and counts everywhere it should.
- Top-management AI Policy (Clause 5 / A.2.2)
- AI System Impact Assessment (A.5.2)
- Statement of Applicability (SoA) for Annex A
- Internal audit + Management Review (Clause 9)
- Continual improvement (Clause 10)
- Records of Processing Activities (Art. 30)
- DPIA for high-risk processing (Art. 35)
- Lawful basis discipline (Art. 6)
- Breach notification — 72 hours (Art. 33)
- Cross-border safeguards — SCCs / BCRs (Art. 46)
- ICO 72-hour breach notification (Art. 33 UK)
- DPIA against ICO high-risk list (Art. 35 UK)
- IDTA or UK Addendum for international transfers (Art. 46 UK)
- DPA 2018 Schedule 1 conditions for SCD
- Notice at Collection (§1798.100)
- Consumer rights: delete / correct / know / opt-out / limit SPI
- Honour Global Privacy Control (GPC) signals
- Service-Provider + Contractor contract terms (§1798.140)
- CPRA Risk Assessment + annual Cybersecurity Audit
- Register of processing activities (Art. 12)
- DPIA for high-risk processing (Art. 22)
- Prior consultation with FDPIC (Art. 23)
- Breach notification to FDPIC (Art. 24)
- Swiss SCCs / adequacy / DPF for cross-border (Arts. 16-18)
- Itemised notice in English + 22 Indian languages (Sec. 5)
- Free, specific, informed, unambiguous consent (Sec. 6)
- Reasonable security safeguards (Sec. 8(5))
- Breach notification to DPB + Data Principals (Sec. 8(6))
- Verifiable parental consent for children (Sec. 9)
- Board-approved AI Policy (Pillar P.1)
- Model Risk Management extended to AI/ML (Pillar G.1)
- Customer disclosure of AI involvement (Pillar Pr.1)
- Fairness testing for credit + insurance AI (Pillar Pr.3)
- AI incident reporting template (Pillar A.2)
- Independent AI audit (Pillar A.1)
- Quarterly AI/ML system inventory + reporting (Cir. 2019/10)
- Sole responsibility for AI outputs (Resp.1)
- Skilled internal oversight team (MG.1)
- Continuous monitoring + drift reporting (MG.3)
- Investor AI disclosure (IP.1)
- 5-year input/output log retention (TF.3)
Build evidence once. Count it everywhere it applies.
Most compliance vendors treat each framework as a silo. We don't. When a GDPR DPIA is approved, it also lights up the relevant EU AI Act Art. 27 FRIA control, the ISO 42001 A.5.2 impact assessment, the UK GDPR Art. 35 DPIA, and the Swiss FADP Art. 22 DPIA — because the underlying analysis is the same and we've curated the mapping.
e.g. GDPR Art. 35 ≡ EU AI Act Art. 27
e.g. ISO 42001 A.6.2.4 V&V supports EU AI Act Art. 15
e.g. CCPA opt-out ≈ GDPR Art. 21 right to object
Coverage you can't get from a horizontal compliance tool.
Vanta, Drata, and OneTrust treat AI as one more checklist. We treat it as the substrate — and we cover the regulators that matter to AI builders in EU, UK, US, Switzerland, and India.